Richmond Mining is focused on the development of the Company’s 100% owned Buena Vista magnetite project. Located in the mining friendly state of Nevada in the United States the project offers investors a low risk entry into an emerging steel mill feedstock.
The United States provides mining companies with well situated and established infrastructure with road, rail and port facilities all in place. For Buena Vista, this established infrastructure reduces the development costs by well in excess of a billion dollars and significantly shortens the time taken to get the project into production.
Richmond has already completed the definitive feasibility study and is now engaged in discussions with banks and other potential providers of finance for the development of Buena Vista. In conjunction with an active programme to secure the remaining mining and environmental permits Richmond anticipates that production will commence within 12-15 months of the securing of final finance. At this stage the first half of calendar 2013 is the targeted date for the commencement of production.
Inclusive to the many advantages inherent in BuenaVista are the low capital cost, the very low risk political environment, the cash costs which are equivalent to or better than the majority of emerging magnetite producers and the relatively short time to production. The project also represents a much lower operational risk than most emerging producers because of the proposed scale of production.
At the end of November 2010, Richmond Mining commissioned GR Engineering Services (GRES) to prepare a Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) for the development of the Buena Vista magnetite ore deposit . The development concept involves an open pit, producing on average some 6 million tonnes per annum of ore along with a similar tonnage of waste per year. Following crushing and grinding the ore is to be concentrated by conventional wet low intensity magnetic separation (Wet LIMS) to produce a high grade concentrate assaying 66-69% total iron (Fe) at an annual production rate of between 1.6 and 1.8 million tonnes. Plant tailings will be discharged to a tailings storage facility (TSF) adjacent to the plant site.
In addition to GRES, RHM selected a Nevada based engineering group, TEC Engineering (TEC); located in Reno to conduct investigations and prepare capital and operating costs for the supply of local services in particular water, power, and general civil construction requirements for the Project. In addition TEC assisted in obtaining local costs for construction materials along with general civil engineering supplies.
In May 2011 the DFS was completed.
The DFS confirmed that the Buena Vista Iron Project is an economically robust, long-life iron ore project which will generate substantial returns for the Company and deliver significant benefits to the local Churchill Pershing and Counties and the State of Nevada.
Key DFS Outcomes
Key Project Metrics – Initial 10 Years of Production
The DFS is based solely on accessing ore from the West deposit to produce on average 1.75 Mtpa (million tonnes per annum) of wet concentrate for an initial 10 years. The concentrate will be sent via a 40 km slurry pipeline to the rail siding located at Colado Junction, 10 km northeast of Lovelock, for dewatering and then transported by rail to a Port in the San Francisco Bay/Delta Region of California.
Iron ore concentrates assaying 66-69% Fe; 1.5-4.5% SiO2; <1% Al2O3; 0.003% P; and 0.003% S will be produced at a rate of 1.75 million wet tonnes per annum and contain 7-7.5% moisture for shipping to Asia.
The existing JORC resources and known exploration targets have the potential to significantly expand the Project’s life past the initial 10 years. This potential is expected to underpin a long-life operation at Buena Vista.
Capital Cost Estimates (US$)
Capital cost estimates were prepared by GR Engineering Services Limited, in conjunction with TEC Civil Engineering Consultants in the USA and other consultants. The estimated capital cost breakdown for the Project piping option is as follows:
| Cost Centre | (US$M) |
| Mining | 5.8 |
| Plant Site | 110.2 |
| Colado Site | 21.8 |
| Site Infrastructure | 4.8 |
| Off Site Infrastructure | 16.4 |
| Owner’s Costs | 2.3 |
| Total Costs | 161.3 |
Two options, namely trucking and piping, were considered for the delivery of the concentrate from the mine site to the Colado rail siding. The concentrate piping alternative, while increasing the capital cost, delivers a number of advantages over trucking, namely:
Operating Cost Estimates (US$)
The total operating cost estimates for the Project (piping option) for the initial 10 years of operation are as follows:
| Cost Centre | Mining US$M | Crushing US$M | Beneficiation US$M | Power US$M | Water US$M | Admin US$M | Total US$M | Total $/wmt conc |
| Fixed | 43.3 | 9.4 | 30.3 | 4.8 | - | 28.5 | 116.3 | 6.86 |
| Variable | 329.4 | 14.9 | 97.0 | 45.0 | 1.9 | - | 488.2 | 28.79 |
| Total Site | 372.7 | 24.3 | 127.3 | 49.8 | 1.9 | 28.5 | 604.5 | 35.65 |
| OffSite |
|
514.4 | 30.33 | |||||
| TOTAL | 1,118.9 | 65.98 |
Financial Evaluation (US$)
Extensive financial modelling has been undertaken for the concentrate operations of the Project. The cash flow model includes revenue, operating costs and capital costs for six monthly periods for the initial 10 years of mine life. As the Buena Vista concentrate would be classified as a high quality pellet feed, the most appropriate benchmarks to use for revenue forecasts are based on either the Vale Standard Sinter Feed price or the Vale Carajas Sinter Feed price.
Iron revenue prices used in the DFS are on an FOB basis, with the base price for 2012 being US$134/t and an average 10 year price of US$110/t.
Capital cost estimates are based on sourcing quality second hand equipment for the major items, such as mills and crushers, with all other equipment based on new prices. A summary of the financial analysis and model outcomes is as follows:
| Item | Value |
| Discount Rate | 7.5% |
| NPV after tax and capex | US$160 M |
| IRR after tax and capex | 41% |
| Capital cost | US$161 M |
| Av. operating cost | US$66/wmt concentrate |
All numbers presented above are for 100% of the Project.
Sensitivity to FOB Price
The DFS has been completed using FOB prices that result in an average FOB price of US$110/t for the initial 10 year Project life. The following table sets out the different NPV’s and IRR’s that would result if FOB prices were increased and that same price was used for each of the Project’s 10 years (all other parameters remain unchanged):
| US$ FOB Price/t | Project NPV after tax and capex | Project IRR after tax and capex | Free Cash before Capex |
| $150 | US$402 M< | 79% | US$868 M |
| $140 | US$341 M | 67% | US$772 M |
| $130 | US$279 M | 56% | US$676 M |
| $120 | US$217 M | 44% | US$580 M< |
| DFS | US$160 M | 41% | US$476 M |